Book Break: Zero Dark Thirty

Zero Dark Thirty
Release Date:
January 11, 2013
Rating: ★★★★☆
Maya is a CIA operative whose first experience is in the interrogation of prisoners following the Al Qaeda attacks against the U.S. on the 11th September 2001. She is a reluctant participant in extreme duress applied to the detainees, but believes that the truth may only be obtained through such tactics. For several years, she is single-minded in her pursuit of leads to uncover the whereabouts of Al Qaeda’s leader, Osama Bin Laden. Finally, in 2011, it appears that her work will pay off, and a U.S. Navy SEAL team is sent to kill or capture Bin Laden. But only Maya is confident Bin Laden is where she says he is.

Review
So this is my first book break featuring a movie. There’s a reason for that. I don’t watch them.  I watched 16 last year.  I keep track.  Anyway, I normally go for comedies and the like – Pitch Perfect was my favorite movie last year – but I had to see this one.  If you saw my post about Nashville, you’ll know that I love Kyle Chandler and he is in this movie, therefore I had to see this movie.  Something this intense and dark, isn’t normally my cup of tea but I went for it.

There are a lot of torture scenes in the beginning, mostly because the movie starts following the hunt for bin Laden in 2003, and it’s still allowed at that time.  I had a really difficult time with this for various reasons – I’m borderline pacifist – but I was also grateful because there was very little blood.  In my opinion, Game of Thrones is more gruesome than this was.  This was more of a psychological torture for both the viewer and the character.  That’s pretty much how the movie begins – after 911 calls from the September 11th attacks, mind you – so I’m in a delicate mind-set as is.  Then we get into the meat of the story – Maya, the CIA agent stationed in Pakistan that the movie follows, gets a lead that she thinks will lead to bin Laden.  We follow her over 8 years as she follows up on that one lead and eventually finds and kills bin Laden.

There are questions about what’s accurate and what’s not but I think that it’s not necessarily about the nitty-gritty with this movie.  It’s more about the overall feeling that you get.  At least, that’s how I felt.  As an American History major, I was interested to see how this story was portrayed.  While they did make Maya a heroine, they also did a good job of portraying the outlook of Americans in general throughout the entirety of ‘The War on Terror.’  I don’t know much about the inner workings of the CIA, FBI or any other alphabetic federal agency but it’s interesting to see how they try to juggle what they think are the biggest threats are at the time.  It was really interesting – very much worth the Golden Globe and Oscar buzz that it’s getting – but it was almost 3 hours long sooooo…I got kind of bored after a while.  The acting was superb, however, and Jessica Chastain is worthy of all the awards – I’m not even a fan of hers either.  I wish Kyle Chandler had a bigger role so he could be eligible for something but he doesn’t.  He’s aces in the scenes he’s in though.  Jason Clarke and Chris Pratt also steal a couple scenes.  It’s definitely worth seeing but be prepared.

Book Break: Sherlock Holmes

Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows
Release Date:
December 16, 2011
Rating: ★★★★☆
Sherlock Holmes and his sidekick Dr. Watson join forces to outwit and bring down their fiercest adversary, Professor Moriarty.

Review

Have you ever been in a theater and been the only person laughing? I have been. During this movie, both times I saw it. I saw it the first time with my friend and we couldn’t stop laughing when no one else was. We were also 30 years younger than everyone. The second time I saw it, my father and I couldn’t stop laughing when no one else did. I went into this movie with low expectations. I do that often. Don’t get my hopes up, etc. Maybe that is why I enjoyed it when critics hated it.

I did though enjoy this movie. The slow-mo, the way Holmes explains the way his mind works, the bromance between Holmes and Watson, the fact watching it a second time helped me catch things I never saw the first time. This is the same Holmes and Watson we fell in love with in the first movie. They’re just fighting a new bad guy. But he’s not really a new bad guy, he was in the first movie as the “man with no face.” This was easily a continuation of the first, but in a sense that if you didn’t see the first you would still know whats going on. It is however a tad too long, even though I can’t think of a scene that was un-needed. In its own way this movie made me want to go to 1890 London and Paris.

There were just enough surprises and twists that I can’t recommend this enough. Plus, again, the bromance between Holmes and Watson, you can cut the tension with a knife. Even more then the first movie. Who knew that was possible?!

Why Books Shouldn’t Be Movies (II)

In case you missed Ashley’s first post, you should know that here at Nose in a Book we’re not the biggest fans of books being adapted into movies.  There are always exceptions – Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, To Kill a Mockingbird, Gone With the Wind and so on – but for the most part, adaptations tend to leave the original fans ostracized.  Sometimes books should stay just that.  Whether it’s not living up to our expectations or just throwing off the entire universe, many people in Hollywood take too much creative license when they translate from page to screen.  It shouldn’t be done with books, however, because the author has already worked so hard to create their specific universe.

The biggest current offender of the book adaptation is the Twilight series.  All of us have become less enamored with the series the longer that its popularity grows and, for my part at least, it’s probably 80% due to the movies.  The books weren’t the best to begin with and the studio’s desire to make the films hip and cool made the somewhat ridiculous book seem downright satirical.  Had the first film not had that blue tint and emo-ness about it, it might not have been half-bad.  Since then, the films have just descended into horrible.

Other terrible adaptations that I’m familiar with also include The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants and A Ring of Endless Light.  The Sisterhood movie was extremely popular (but then again so was Twilight) and while I thought that the casting was spectacular, the screenplay was lackluster.  The drama wasn’t high enough, the happiness wasn’t light enough, etc etc.  It just fell flat.  There were a few spectacular scenes but mostly because they were just iconic moments from the book.  Also, most people haven’t read A Ring of Endless Light by Madeleine L’Engle (they tend to stick with A Wrinkle in Time) nor did they know it was a Disney Channel Original Movie back in the day.  Growing up this was my absolute favorite book – I still have my battered copy on my bookshelf – and Disney totally butchered the story.  I remember watching it once and never again because I was so disappointed.  Mischa Barton played Vicky, the main character, if that tells you anything.  Oh and another favorite childhood novel that I just remembered – Ella Enchanted.  There was no spontaneous singing in the book, thanks.

And these are just the ones I thought of off the top of my head.  I don’t watch that many movies and I shy away from book adaptations even more.  If I really researched I bet I could find dozens and dozens more.  As I thought about this post though, I started to notice a pattern between the good and the bad adaptations…the young adult genre.  Aside from some classics, many of the young adult adaptations in the last decade have been…horrendous to say the least.  I think that, because of the success of Harry Potter, everyone wants to find their own cash cow to milk.  I’d like to say something to studios and authors alike: Harry Potter is an anomaly and it is highly unlikely you will make something else comparable.  Now please stop.  But back to the point, studios try too hard to be the next big thing instead of trying to stay true to the story.  It was popular to begin with for a reason and people need to stop forgetting that.  And if you don’t believe that studios aren’t specifically going after young adult novels, then there’s a Wall Street Journal article that backs me up.

And here are some books that have been optioned for movies and we’re (probably not) looking forward to…

  • Divergent by Veronica Roth
  • Unearthly by Cynthia Hand (TV)
  • Beautiful Creatures by Kami Garcia and Margaret Stohl
  • Shiver by Maggie Stiefvater
  • Fallen by Lauren Kate
  • Delirium by Lauren Oliver
  • City of Bones by Cassandra Clare (included only to be thorough)
  • Sloppy Firsts by Megan McCafferty

BUT WE STILL HAVE HOPES FOR THE HUNGER GAMES SO LET’S KEEP OUR FINGERS CROSSED, OK?

Why Books Shouldn’t Be Movies (I)

Breaking Dawn Part I by Stephenie Meyer
Release Date:
November 18, 2011
Rating: ★☆☆☆☆
Twilight tempted the imagination. New Moon made readers thirsty for more. Eclipseturned the saga into a worldwide phenomenon. And now, the book that everyone has been waiting for—Breaking Dawn, the final book in the #1 bestselling Twilight Saga, will take your breath away. — Book blurb

Review
The one star is because I didn’t want to be the first zero star, and it is a hilarious comedy.

No really, I couldn’t stop rolling my eyes and laughing.

Book Break: J. Edgar

J. Edgar
Release Date:
November 11, 2011
Rating: ★★★☆☆
Based on the life of J. Edgar Hoover, the man often credited with making the FBI what it is today: an efficient, crime-fighting organization shrouded in secrecy. Hoover founded the organization in 1935 and remained director until his death in 1972. –Yahoo Movies

Review

I am welcoming a new sub-category to Book Break! Movies! When I had time I used to see a lot of them, and I’m slowly working my way back into watching mass amounts of them.

It is a known fact I am a history nerd. Heck, most people have learned to embrace this. The problem with this is historical books and movies often scream my name, even when they are ripe with historical inaccuracies and make me rage. The Other Bolyen Girl,  anyone? I’ve learned to go into historical movies and books with the fact that they are for entertainment and not historical fact seriously. Yes, I have to remind myself of this. My BFFSarah has to do this with the CSI Franchise (hi Sarah!)

I still, with all this background, let my parents talk me into seeing J. Edgar, in part because I hadn’t been to the movies in forever and in part because this wasn’t my area of focus and I wouldn’t have a nervous tick every time something was ‘wrong.’ I’m weirdly glad they talked me into the movie. It was fantastic. The acting was an amazing all-star cast, that could easily be Oscar worthy. The way Clint Eastwood handled the sensitive topics, along with the mood and lighting made it a good movie. It made me want to know more and see more.

Of course I still had problems with the movie. But give me credit, they were non-history problems! The main issue I had with the movie was the fact it was a tad long at around two hours and fifteen minutes, almost two and a half with previews. Where did all the previews come from? No really, the elderly man in the theater kept yelling at the screen for the movie to show. There were numerous parts that could have been cut out and would have made no difference one bit. There were also often times that something would be brought up to never be mentioned again. Why bring it up at all? To torture the viewers? Also, if it did not have such stellar cast, the movie could have easily fell flat, fast.

So yes, this movie could easily be Oscar worthy, and I wouldn’t be shocked to see any of them nominated, but the problems is in the script and what’s it’s lacking, which in the end, is a lot. This could easily be a rental.